Leveson safety case. This bold statement has certainly attracted attention to the paper, no doubt due at least in part to the high esteem the author is justifiably held in. Certification of safety-critical systems is usually based on evaluation of whether a system or product reduces risk of specific losses to an acceptable level. The Question Lots of talk about assuring safety (after system designed) and safety cases for certification and approval. It has made a very difficult process of assessing safety risk even more difficult. It does not search the content of the linked files. There are major differences, however, in how that decision is made and on what evidence is required. Professor Leveson’s paper, “The use of Safety Cases in Certification and Regulation” has attracted particular attention because of the statement that: “some industries To avoid confusion, this paper uses the term “assurance cases” for the general term and limits the use of the term “safety case” to a very specific definition as an argument for why the system is safe. Erik Hollnagel and labeled as “Safety-II” and argued to be the basis for achieving system resilience. Some have assumed the paper “The use of Safety Cases in Certification and Regulation” by Professor Nancy Leveson A review by Peter Wilkinson1 Noetic Group To avoid confusion, this paper uses the term “assurance cases” for the general term and limits the use of the term “safety case” to a very specific definition as an argument for why the system is safe. Introduction Certification of safety-critical systems is usually based on evaluation of whether a system or product reduces risk of specific losses to an acceptable level. Introduction There is an ongoing debate, (primarily) in the United States about the utility or otherwise of safety cases in relation to offshore oil and gas activities in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Goal is to argue that design will be safe (after detailed design complete) Nov 1, 2011 ยท Professor Leveson's statement that the paper represents a serious blow to advocates of the use of safety cases in offshore oil and gas does not appear to be substantiated and is not borne out by the published data. Search: Note: This searches the text below and a few keywords. The term arises The Use of Safety Cases in Certification and Regulation by Nancy Leveson. The first important distinction is between types of regulation. Introduction Certification of safety-critical systems is usually based on evaluation of whether a system or product reduces risk of specific losses to an acceptable level. This paper examines the use of safety cases and regulation in general. The term Safety Case has become popular recently as a solution to the problem of regulating safety-critical systems. The Nancy Leveson Aeronautics and Astronautics MIT The concept seems to be spreading quickly that the safety case is the answer to our problems in safety engineering. ” People stop reporting errors and problems Just Culture . The Nancy’s White Papers Recent white papers by Nancy Leveson: Nancy Leveson, Safety-III: A Systems Approach to Safety and Resilience, July 2020 Recently, there has been a lot of interest in some ideas proposed by Prof. Blame is the Enemy of Safety “My UK safety customers are incredibly spooked by [the Nimrod accident report] because of the way it singled out individuals in the safety assessment chain for criticism. An earlier version of this paper appeared in the Journal of System Safety , Nov/Dec 2011. After 32 years of experience in system safety engineering, I am afraid that we are in danger of becoming the proverbial lemmings when jumping on this bandwagon and we will all end up plunging into the sea. l38h 6mbsjs9pm k8 wiv crehu rnbed g5gx98s hhs z9 86